Long-time KGO Radio host Bernie Ward has been indicted on federal child pornography charges. He appeared in Federal Court in San Francisco this afternoon, on two counts of receiving and transmitting child porn. Ward’s attorney, Doron Weinberg, tells the I-Team the charges relate to Ward’s book project from several years ago. According to Weinberg, Ward was exploring “hypocrisy in America”, and decided to look at child porn – how it’s acquired and hidden from society. As part of the research for the book, Weinberg says Ward acquired several images of child porn from websites, and “he exchanged them with adults who do the same thing.”
In December of 2004, FBI agents raided Ward’s home and confiscated his computer. Weinberg says Ward has spent the last several years trying to convince the federal government that the research “was not being done to exploit children. … He was exploring the subculture. It was done for what seemed to be a good purpose.”
Weinberg says Ward has not accessed child porn in the three years since the FBI raid, that the federal case is based only on what happened in 2004. The federal indictment is sealed at this point -- Weinberg says it should be unsealed next week, and he declined to provide a copy to the I-Team.
By the way, Weinberg says Ward never finished the book, that the FBI raid killed the project.



What a story Ward & his lawyer have fabricated!
Ward is, I think, guilty until proven innocent.
Joyce Dunn
Posted by: joyce dunn | December 06, 2007 at 07:43 PM
Hmmmn, not sure I am buying this story. While I might be able to suspend my disbelief long enough to accept that he was researching a book, he totally lost me when the information is presented (by his OWN attorney) that he traded child porn with other pedophiles.
This is the end of Bernie Ward.
Posted by: RightWinger | December 06, 2007 at 07:45 PM
Maybe he can call Pete Townsend for some legal advice on how to skate this one...who'd have thought a former priest would be involved in this type of stuff...
Posted by: Steve M | December 06, 2007 at 07:49 PM
I've listened to Bernie for several years now by downloading his broadcasts and listening on my ipod. Very shocked and saddened by the whole thing. I am all about innocent until proven guilty, but his lawyer's lame comments are not helping his case. If he is guilty, shame on him. I feel for his family.
Posted by: NM | December 06, 2007 at 07:57 PM
Mr. Noyes, Did you get the lawyer's name wrong? Should it be Doron and not Doren?
If so, you might have better luck contacting the lawyer here:
http://www.lawyers.com/weinberg&wilder/jsp2165405.jsp
*** Note from Dan Noyes: Thanks for help with the typo. I did speak with Doron Weinberg -- his quotes were the basis for the blog. ***
Posted by: StemCellGum | December 06, 2007 at 08:03 PM
I am shocked at the charges against Bernie Ward revealed today. I have been listening to Bernie's programs for years and he is nothing but straight-forward, passionate, and dedicated to his family. I cannot believe one of the latest whims of the current "government" -- that criminalizes anyone it wishes and gives medals to criminals -- has any merit whatsoever.
It sickens me to read the blogs above that are apparently from nothing but right-wingers who should move to the red states and stay there.
Posted by: Kathie T | December 06, 2007 at 08:07 PM
When it's a right-winger, everyone jumps on them..when it's a liberal, "it can't possibly be true." If this above garbage is all his attorney can come up with, then HE'S GUILTY AS SIN. PUN INTENDED.
I'm sure they have quite a bit on him, or they wouldn't be prosecuting.
Posted by: Bob | December 06, 2007 at 08:20 PM
I detest those who abuse children to no end. In fact, I'd like to donate the rope for those guilty.
But is he?
A lot of left-wing people DO investigate such things, and there are volumes of stuff like this in Books-A-Million and Barnes & Nobles. He'll be hard pressed to explain the child pornography.
Posted by: Scott | December 06, 2007 at 08:37 PM
He is already trying to blame Bush for the mess he finds himself in. Shame on him for a weak attempt to cover his own behind. He will find out about child porn as he will be very happy with all the attention he gets in jail
Posted by: Shame on You | December 06, 2007 at 08:42 PM
Bernie Ward has been one of the first to pronounce guilt on other bay area celebrities, while the FBI and Federal authorities were still investigating (Can you say Barry Bonds?) and even when indictments came years after the alleged criminal activities.
So, Bernie, how does it feel now?
Posted by: Scott | December 06, 2007 at 08:46 PM
Kathie T
Go ahead invite him over to watch your kids. He is OLNY being targeted by RIGHT WINGERS who want to silence him.
This will be fun to watch.
Posted by: Sure you would | December 06, 2007 at 08:48 PM
I am not a Bernie Ward fan. However, he has not had anything negative to say about Barry Bonds and his indictment. He obviously knew that his own case was pending and there was no way he would have made any such pronouncement.
Posted by: phil the irregular | December 06, 2007 at 08:53 PM
You know, the definition of "child pornography" is written in such broad and subjective terms that for all we know the feds could be arguing that he traded pictures of fully clothed children in a park.
I kid you not, the feds did try to argue that picture of fully clothed children in a park were inappropriate because the venue could arouse pedophiles. This was shot down by a judge but they were well within the definition when they argued that.
Posted by: Anonymous | December 06, 2007 at 09:02 PM
I wish bernie well whatever the outcome. The story is a shock, but after checking the web, dan noyes is the only person to use the phrase (as doron's quote) "he exchanged them with adults who do the same thing." the key of course being "the same thing" . This phrase made it to wikipedia like instant mashed potatoes. All other accounts so far refer to to "adults" period. Is Noyes trying to squeeze a bit more juice from the grape?
*** Note from Dan Noyes: Please. The above was a very simple blog written quickly and accurately after a phone conversation with Ward's lawyer. I merely conveyed what he said. Just the straight story. ***
Posted by: will segen | December 06, 2007 at 09:04 PM
What goes around does eventually come around, Bernie. Interesting that the "book project" was never finished. His cyber co-author is probably preoccupied as well at the moment, trying to come up with similar "research" excuses.
Posted by: Jim | December 06, 2007 at 09:18 PM
Heh, heh, heh. So, the fat blowhard finally got hit. The Lion of the Left is down. This man has been a wacko during all the years he's been on the radio. Only Ray Taliaferro is more insane than Bernie. Sorry for his family and kids though. I remember him spewing his venom against President Reagan when he passed away. Bernie, I hope they give you a little special lovin in jail.
Posted by: I'm on the right | December 06, 2007 at 09:25 PM
OH THIS IS SO GOOD .......
Posted by: RIGHT WING PIG | December 06, 2007 at 09:26 PM
I think the lawyer's contention that the book was killed because of the FBI investigation is lame. What, you can't do a book on hypocrisy in America without including a chapter on child-porn?!?
Posted by: MM | December 06, 2007 at 09:30 PM
Hey StemCellGum,
How could you make such a statement without reviewing any of the evidence, which is not available to the public. I personally don't care what his polictics are, as if they define guilt or innocence. It must be a huge government conspicacy, right? And about giving metals to criminals, the CONTRACTORS are not awarded metals, stupid. I was recently discharged from the Navy, and have first hand knowledge of militart affairs (enlisted AE). It is easy to point fingers at 18-30 soldiers the MUST obey by the USMJ. You have not one clue execpt what you see on TV and in movies. Please don't get me wrong, I don't agree with the war ( couldnt say until I got out!) but if you knew what was happening, you would be mad the person in charge...Mr Bush, Mr Cheney, and the private contractors making 5 times the soldier for the same job. Back to the subject. To draw the conclusion that he MUST be innocent is not possible until the evidence, and the trial take place. If he is truely innocent or guilty, he will be tried by a jury of his peer's, non of whom will have anything personally against him. Nobody can truthfully say he guilty or innocent at this point, to make the assertion is illogical.
Posted by: 26yoVET | December 06, 2007 at 09:37 PM
I don't believe it for a New York minute. I think it is just the (expletive) bush administation who don't want progressive talk show hosts telling the truth about what their doing, but we already do!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: donna noe-murdock | December 06, 2007 at 09:54 PM
It's worth remembering that, believe it or not, child porn was once LEGAL. Then, in 1975 it became "somewhat" illegal, i.e. you couldn't buy or sell it or produce it (or reproduce it) but you could still "keep your stash" and show it to others. Then, it became illegal to show it to others, but you could still "keep your stash". Finally, it became illegal to possess it, regardless if it had been purchased when legal and, of course, the penalties have steadily become greater. So, if one had bought such a collection back in 1974, put it in the attic and then forgot about it (and if it were to remain there to the present), then one would now be guilty of a very serious felony/ies.
Posted by: David Kennerly | December 06, 2007 at 09:55 PM
I will take my right wing pill popper over this leftard pedophile any day. What goes around comes around!
Posted by: CC | December 06, 2007 at 09:56 PM
Hey 26yoVET,
Double-check to whom you're attributing posts. 'kaaayyy.
But back to the story, did the original 2004 "raid" ever make the press?
And how is it that the feds go through a lag of three years between raid and indictment?
Posted by: StemCellGum | December 06, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Interesting.. Because this Bernie fellow (whom I have never listened too) is obviously a big shot. He may be the OJ Simpson or Michael Jackson to put a prosecutor in his place. We all forget, that when the founding fathers founded America, if they had debated the concept of erotica (and it did exist back then) they would have absolutely forbade the state from invasion of privacy. The founding fathers where so high minded that the discussion of such subjects was below them. Now an entire branch of the USA economy (the government) makes its living off of thought crime. A lady taking pictures of an electric tower is arrested (she was a meek little artist) You discuss weapons in a chat room.. it goes on and on. You either like the idea of thought crime, or you don’t. If you say you’re in the middle…some things are thought crime.. you are not in the middle.. you believe in thought crime. When you tell your neighbor, "I will help lock you up, for what your read or say.." you just keep going down that slope. Guilty or innocent, who cares, for it is thought crime by definition. I hope he writes his book. Janet Reno the spinster, kills a bunch of kids... to save them from thought crime. What a country. Careful citizens.. for you may just get Hilary Clinton for president. Thought crime = more raw power for those in office. Me.. I’m voting for Ron Paul
Posted by: Buddy Buddyfoocko | December 06, 2007 at 10:12 PM
Doesn't it always seem like it's the people who do the preaching that end up with the skeletons falling out of their closet? H Y P O C R I T E S !
Innocent until proven guilty yes, but my women's intuition says he's probably guilty.
Posted by: Sarah | December 06, 2007 at 10:24 PM